Talk:Jury research
Latest comment: 8 months ago by 2A00:23C5:C95F:D901:2852:2FC6:B59A:69E8 in topic This article is terrible!
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Is there any online resource that tracks the decline of jury trials in various jurisdictions?-Shtove 23:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)-23:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Merger proposal edit
The subject matter of Jury research and Scientific jury selection seem to be more or less identical. SJS appears to be a more comprehensive treatment of the subject. I propose merging the content of the two pages into "Jury research", removing duplication, and creating a redirect from "Scientific jury selection" for people searching on that term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.216.181.230 (talk) 21:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- They're not identical. Jury research is a much broader field. The article on scientific jury selection is much longer, so merging would overwhelm this umbrella topic. It makes more sense to create a summary paragraph here, in accordance with Wikipedia:Summary style, and use {{main}} to link to the article on SJS. I oppose a merger.--Chaser (talk) 05:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
This article is terrible! edit
Worse than none at all. Fivetonsflax (talk) 08:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- This article does not present the information that the title suggests. If you are looking for ways to do jury research, this article won't help you.Jabrams1678 (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed, it's like a very bad undergraduate essay. Having it here in this form does more harm than good. 2A00:23C5:C95F:D901:2852:2FC6:B59A:69E8 (talk) 20:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)