This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The recent inclusion (reference 4) appears to be written by a Labour Party activist with a political and personal axe to grind (see bilious article posted on http://skwalker1964.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/mid-staffs-ward-10-2007-relative-shatters-julie-baileys-story/by the same man.) NPOV breach is fairly evident..another patient's [unverifiable] satisfaction with care of a relative several months after events experienced by others neither proves that Ms. Bailey is a 'liar', as claimed in this article,nor that she is working 'for' the Conservative Party. I moot for deletion on NPOV grounds, unverifiable/poor source and potential libel of a living person - any views?79.74.96.40 (talk) 02:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)twl79.74.96.40 (talk) 02:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes let us check for POV even now. Zezen (talk) 06:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
