Talk:Judgment (video game)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs) 19:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

I’ll be reviewing this shortly. Toa Nidhiki05 19:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Prose

• The word "yakuza" appears to be inconsistently italicized throughout the article. This should be corrected to be consistent, unless standards are different for members of the yakuza vs the yakuza itself
  • Done
• In the lede, reword "Takayuki Yagami as he and his allies" to "Takayuki Yagami and his allies as they"
  • Done
• In characters, pipe "Korean films" to Cinema of Korea
  • Done
• In release, change "has 60 frames per second" to "runs at 60 frames per second" and pipe frames per second to frame rate
• Done
• In remastered, change "suffered" to "struggled"
  • Done.

Conclusion

Overall, fantastic article - really well done, Tintor2! Just a handful of prose issues. Once these are addressed, it's good to go. Great work - and now I'm interested in the game! Toa Nidhiki05 01:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC) @Toa Nidhiki05: Thanks for the review. I revised all the issues.Tintor2 (talk) 01:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: