Talk:Judd, for the Defense

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Original Research edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article states: "Throughout the course of the two-year run of the show, there were never enough viewers to establish Foreman's claim [that the show appropriated his legal career for commercial purposes], although critics gave it positive reviews. Undoubtedly the skittishness of viewers was a result of the program's dealing with then-taboo (though contemporary) subjects such as homosexuality, blacklisting, and draft dodgers, with open-ended conclusions in many episodes." The first claim appears to be nonsense - what does the success of the show have to do with whether it "stole" details of a lawyer's career for commercial purpose? Be that as it may, both claims appear to be the author's opinion rather than based upon any sources - hence, would appear to violate Wiki policy against original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.14 (talk) 11:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judd, for the Defense. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070816115147/http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/lpop/tv/tvlawyers-alpha.html to http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/lpop/tv/tvlawyers-alpha.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic