Talk:Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Cancer Treatment Reports and other things edit

The NCI writes [1]

The original Journal of the National Cancer Institute was created by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in the 1940s to focus attention specifically on cancer research by providing the first venue for publication of exclusively cancer-related scientific papers. The journal's name was later changed officially to the name of JNCI. In the 1960s, NCI inaugurated a second journal, Cancer Treatment Reports, dedicated to clinical cancer research. In 1987, NCI, under Director Vincent DeVita, M.D., decided to discontinue both JNCI and Cancer Treatment Reports. In March 1988, initially designed as an experiment, NCI inaugurated a new Journal of the National Cancer Institute, named to reflect the long lineage of scientific journal publications by NCI and to reflect the original name from the 1940s (this version was never referred to as 'JNCI'). The new Journal would be dedicated to the rapid publication of the highest-quality cancer-related scientific papers from all areas of research.

Emphasis mine.

Also, this suggest that CTR was established in 1959, and the end date may indicate that something happened in 1983 (a change in publisher?). I also find some evidence that something happened to CTR in 1976. There is talk of CTR being the result of the merger of Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, Part 1 (ISSN 0069-0112), Part 2 (ISSN 0069-0120) and Part 3 (ISSN 0069-0139). See also this.

NCI says:

  • Two JCNI, one in the 1940s (date uncertain), discontinued. New publication also titled JNCI established in March 1988 after the merger of JCNI (old) and CRT.
  • CTR established in the 1960s (date uncertain).

Others sources say:

  • CTR established in 1959

We write

  • JNCI established in 1940. CRT merged into JNCI, which was never discontinued.
  • CTR established in 1983

Can anyone can make sense of this?Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 03:38, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Last night in PubMed's Jornals database I sensed something was amiss, but didn't have time to look into it deeper (nor have I now, I'm afraid...) However, as for the "discontinuation", I would not treat the two "versions" of JNCI as two different journals: same title, same ISSN, continuation (as far as I can see) basically seamless. I think it would be best to see it as a change of publisher or something like that. As for CTR, as it was the name of a journal that later became part of JNCI, I would regard this as a former name (part of the current journal was known as this in its earlier history), but don't care much if it is included in the infobox as such. I have not found a foundation date for CTR with certainty. The "1940" in the article comes from PubMed. CTR seems to have existed before 1983, WorldCat medntions "Description based on: Vol. 63, no. 1 (Jan. 1979)." --Crusio (talk) 08:04, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Any opinion on the reconstruction below?Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 10:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Looks pretty accurate and in accordance with the sources. Good job! --Crusio (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Reconstruction of events edit

Here's my reconstruction of events:

Also

  • National Cancer Institute monograph established in 1959 [12]
  • Cancer Treatment Symposia (ISSN 0742-1761) established in 1983 [13]
  • Cancer Treatment Symposia merged with National Cancer Institute monograph, which is renamed NCI Monographs (ISSN 0893-2751) in 1986 [14]
  • NCI Monographs renamed Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs (ISSN 1052-6773) in 1990 [15]

Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 03:58, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Infobox edit

I agree that there should be just one article on JNCI and JNCIM, but perhaps it would be more elegant to put two infoboxes instead of one (as is being done in some other journal articles, too)? As it is, the OCLC, LCCN etc of the JNCIM are not in the infobox (nor can they be accommodated), whereas the current infobox is rather cluttered. It would also make it easier to upload cover images for both journal sections. --Crusio (talk) 13:51, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sure, why not. On a semi-related, but independent note, we should think of a way for that infobox to handle two/three journals. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • OK, I'll see when I can find a moment and will put in the second box. As for changing the existing box, I don't understand too well how those things work, so I'm afraid all I can do would be to stand at the side, watch, and give my opinion... --Crusio (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)Reply