Talk:Journal of Parapsychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Still being published? edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Because the link to the journal webpage is broken eh? If this journal isn't being published anymore the article should be adjusted accordingly. Simonm223 (talk) 20:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Legit? edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This journal doesn't exactly sound like it deals in legitimate science. It /could/, I suppose, but the only way I can think of is if it pretty much exclusively publishes papers disproving parapsychological concepts (or papers that, in a legitimate scientific way, do lend credence to the concepts). Should it be covered, whichever way it goes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hppavilion1 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notability edit

Latest comment: 9 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I tagged this article for notability. It does not seem to fit notability criteria for GNG or WP:ORG. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:23, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

It appears that this journal also fails WP:NJOURNALS. Not listed in the Master Journal List of WOS. I didn't check SCOPUS, but I doubt it is currently listed there. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

There might be coverage in newspapers in the days of yore [1]. I haven't had a chance to go through these sources yet to see what kind of coverage there is. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 03:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

The journal is eminently notable, being one of the primary drivers of research (as questionable in quality as it is) in that area. It's cultural impacts have been massive, though perhaps indirect, with entire genres of horror/fiction based on the shit that got published in there over the years. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:21, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic