Improvements edit

There are many WP:Peacock terms/phrases used throughout the article which make it sound like a fan page, not an encyclopedia article. Clerks. (talk) 15:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Read the article, and it sounds nothing like a fan page. While there are articles here that do, this is not one of them. If you feel some of the language is peacock-y, then fix it. Tagging accomplishes nothing in this case. H2O Shipper 17:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wildcard return edit

Okay, so one article thinks that the wildcard was brought back because of Josiah Leming's elimination... That makes no sense, because he got cut before the voting started, so that wouldn't have applied to him. Also, his elimination wasn't THAT controversial to bring back the wildcard, they clearly use dth examples of Tamyra Grey, Jennifer Hudson, Chris Daughtry, and Michael Johns. Besides, he got eliminated because his last performance was bad. 24.224.170.188 (talk)Roshan —Preceding undated comment added 03:13, 28 March 2009 (UTC).Reply

We go by sources, not by what our own thoughts on the matter might be. The article says what the sources say. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unitanode (talkcontribs) 17:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply