Talk:José N. Gándara

Damiens edits

I have reverted the edits becaseu none of them are valid. Discuss here and reach consensus. Mercy11 (talk) 14:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Since Damiens is not answering despite continuing to edit heavily elsewhere, I will assume his offical response is THIS and THIS. Mercy11 (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

I wont address his Wp:OWN issue, since I believe it will become a moot point as the discussion goes on. As for specifics of my revert.

1. As for THIS EDIT, the lead is too long: Every article needs a leded, implying that 1 paragraph is too long is way off.

2. As for THIS EDIT, famous: This is a don't care; either way iif fine with me, go ahead remove the word famous if you object to it that badly. It is, however, not a violation of WP:PEACOCK.

3. As for THIS EDIT, removal of the Ponce link from See also: WP:MOS supports this.

4. As for THIS EDIT, CN and SP banners

(4a) CN banner:
Every paragraph has at least one citation, therefore no cites are missing

(4b) SPS banner:
Dr. Gandara has been dead for 50 years, and the publication is from the administration of the public, Commonwealth, government school that bears his name in his honor, as such this is not an SPS. To be exact, the information was reprinted from El Mundo as the article states.

5. As for THIS EDIT, Geocities unreliable and SP: You will have to explain how this is unreliable and self-published. Or take it to WP:RSN. IAE, WP:TAGBOMBing and being WP:POINTy, as you did, "is highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban".

6. As for THIS EDIT, one of Ponce's greatest physicians.: If the phrase bothers you and your preference is to risk text copyright violation by using the exact same words as those used by the citation, go ahead and knock yourself out, but I don';t support it.

7. As for THIS EDIT, article citation format: WP:CITE, "templates should not be added without consensus to an article that already uses a consistent referencing style"

8. As for THIS EDIT, repeated citation: Changing all citations to fit one's preferred style is no different that edit warring over leaving the version of the text that reflectrs one's won preferences instead of consensus.

9. As for THIS EDIT, repeated citation (again): Again, changing all citations to fit one's preferred style is no different that edit warring over leaving the version of the text that reflectrs one's won preferences instead of consensus.

10. As for THIS EDIT, changing a title name: By your own admission you did not know the title name, so you speculated in changing it. WP:OR

11. As for THIS EDIT, proper page title spelling - after guessing: If you are not proficient in Spanish, you should not venture by guessing. This should had been an undo rather than to continue guessing.

12. As for THIS EDIT, format: WP:CITE, "templates should not be added without consensus to an article that already uses a consistent referencing style"

13. As for THIS EDIT, lumping 3 banners together: This would had been a moot point if you had tageed it with one 1 banner to begin with.

Regards, please discuss objections here instead of reverting. Reverting can get you blocked from editing this and other articles. Mercy11 (talk) 19:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)