Talk:Jonathon Lyons

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Astapor12 in topic Cleanup

Contested deletion edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this is a six-year-old article about a notable person. If you want to delete it it will have to go though the regular deletion process. You can't delete under CSD A7 an "article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines" — Bucephalus (talk) 15:43, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Jonathon Lyons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup edit

I was going to rewrite this article because as it is, the article does not make sense. However, when I followed the sources to clarify the information, I found that the sources are either non-existent or have no real content. This article needs to either be completely re-written, or deleted. Astapor12 (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply