 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Deleted the following line on the basis of WP:NOR:
- Most of Abbey's characters are deeply flawed in some way, and yet there is usually something noble about them. You may disagree with the means of the Monkey Wrench Gang, but you understand the cause they're fighting for.
It seems to me to be a novel interpretation of Abbey's work, it's too general, and it's not even about the book at hand. Lowerarchy 18:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
The entire plot summary here is written like a student's book report, blending fact, opinion, and unsourced context. It repeatedly uses the second person voice, which is certainly not encyclopedic. Unfortunately, this is Abbey's least available work, and I don't know of an easy way to correct it. Simply deleting the summary looks like a clear downgrade; can anyone source a better summary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.104.218.242 (talk) 18:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)