GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Johnny McNichol/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:20, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Very well written, couldn't fault it.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    All challengeable claims are verifiably referenced.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Covers the subject as well as is possible.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    No bias noted in the prose.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Image of Johnny seems suitably licensed.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Pass The Rambling Man (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Content previously citing deprecated source moved from article pending better source edit

The surviving members of Chelsea's 1955 title-winning team used to meet for an annual dinner, and were guests of the club at the last match of the 2004–05 season as they celebrated their second League title, 50 years after the first.[citation needed] moved here by Struway2 (talk) 20:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply