Talk:John Wood (design theorist)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Lame Name in topic Recent substantial deletions
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled edit
Greetings - this is intended as a simple overview of my professional achievements and experiences, to date.Prof John Wood (talk) 07:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Recent substantial deletions edit
I'm concerned about this sequence of edits, where one editor has substantially deleted the text of this article. I also fail to see any justification for tagging a referenced article on a Fellow of the RSA for notability!
There's a COI risk involved here, but there seems to be little actual content that's a problem as a result of it. "Excessive detail" is about the worst of it, and I'd appreciate it if someone could point me at our current policies for economy of wikitext in the current byte shortage.
Andy Dingley (talk) 16:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- We could start with Wikipedia requirements for verification of notability via independent sources. The article was in a very scrappy state so I cleaned it up as I am required to do. There were no substantial deletions. All changes were noted in the edit summaries. Feel free to expand and improve - with reference to reliable sources of course. Lame Name (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)