This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
John Seed is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
It's crazy to imply, as it does on the main page, that John Seed may not be notable. He is one of the most important environmentalists of the last 40 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C55:7200:39F:1D45:27EA:2E9F:1A5F (talk) 20:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
I tend to agree. Because he's been active for almost half a century, most good sources about him are buried in offline sources or old articles that don't get a ton of traffic, so the references to him on the first page of search results look like they're not independent, which looks on the surface like he's not notable by Wikipedia's definition of notability. But I'm having a lot of luck digging just a little bit more. I'll add some of the references I'm finding to support information on the page, and we'll see where we end up, but personally I think the case for notability here is strong. - Astrophobe (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
