Talk:John McCaffary

Wisconsin Mid‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Twenty Minutes? edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

None of the primary sources or cited sources indicate that it took twenty minutes to strangle John McCaffary. Both the Telegraph and the Free Democrat eyewitness accounts agree on five minutes, plus eight minutes to verify death and cut him down. The article is written throughout to emphasize what seems to be an apocryphal lurid telling of a slow strangulation, when none of the aspects of a "botched execution" seem to be present in the contemporary or reputable secondary accounts. "Twenty minutes" should be carefully sourced or the article should be rewritten in a less sensationalist viewpoint. 50.250.153.83 (talk) 20:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hmm ... how carefully have you read all of the included sources? I started with "The case of John McCaffary". Wisconsin Magazine of History. At p. 286:

... the prisoner was hoisted into the air. ... He continued to struggle for five minutes. After he had been suspended 8 minutes, the physicians were called upon the stand to examine his pulse, at which time his pulse was slightly reduced, and continued to beat for about ten minutes longer, at which time life was extinct ...

So that's 18 minutes. He didn't struggle for nearly 20 minutes after the hanging, but he was alive for nearly 20 minutes afterwards. If someone lives for 20 minutes after being hanged, it's reasonably fair to say that the hanging was botched, since that is generally not what was intended. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 07:37, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John McCaffary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060930170909/http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Wisconsin_s_legal_history to http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Wisconsin_s_legal_history&TEMPLATE=%2FCM%2FContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=35841

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic