Year of birth edit

The case was heard on Monday, 17 January 1597, which is a Julian date. Some writers have wrongly dated it as 1598. As Derrick was 59 then, he was probably born in 1538. He would have been born in 1537 if his birthday was between 18 January and 24 March. BlackJack | talk page 18:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Image of Irelande, with a Discoverie of Woodkarne edit

Is this the same John Derrick(e) who wrote The Image of Irelande, with a Discoverie of Woodkarne? (See red link on that article.) --RA (talk) 00:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unknown. Right period but all we know of the Guildford Derrick is that he was a coroner. ----Jack | talk page 21:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Derrick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Date math error? edit

"17 January 1597 (Julian date and thus 1598 by modern reckoning)"

This is surely not correct. At the time, the difference between the Julian and Gregorian calendars was only ten days. It certainly wasn't 348 days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.23.127.25 (talk) 09:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

It is correct. You're looking at it from the wrong angle. The year 1597, like all in the Julian calendar, was March to March. If the Gregorian calendar had been in use then, the year would have begun in January as it does now and it would have been 1598. Hope this helps. Jack | talk page 14:15, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

"John Derek (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect John Derek (disambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 17#John Derek (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply