Talk:John Cuckney, Baron Cuckney
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Road Wizard in topic name change
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Untitled edit
Just a note that even if I had seen the WP:CSD nomination on this, I would have declined it, because members of the United Kingdom peerage, even life peers, are inherently notable. It should have been marked as a stub and left for expansion. As I now do. --Rodhullandemu 00:13, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
name change edit
this is the onl time i have seen an article name like this... any plans to move it?--Jakezing (talk) 15:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- What is the problem with the name? It seems to be consistent with the normal naming of life peer articles. Many other examples of this naming convention can be found in the Members of the House of Lords list. Road Wizard (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- John Cuckney, Baron Cuckney. Why do we have both his name and title though that in no way makes any sence; use the first or second as the article title.--Jakezing (talk) 22:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- This article's name complies with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles). If you have a problem with the convention then you should raise it there. Road Wizard (talk) 22:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- John Cuckney, Baron Cuckney. Why do we have both his name and title though that in no way makes any sence; use the first or second as the article title.--Jakezing (talk) 22:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)