Talk:Joey Jeremiah

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Photo edit

can someone get a nice photo of him? or maybe even one when he was young and one now? it would really improve the article, as he is an easily recognizeable character. --Someones life 06:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was

This request move was not formatted properly. so I will removed the history from Joey Jeremiah so that any registered editor can make the move. I do not watch this talk page so leave me a message on my user talk page if you need further assistance. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 14:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Joesph JeremiahJoey Jeremiah The page was moved (without discussion) to Joesph "Joey" Jeremiah earlier today. Another editor's good-faith attempt to reverse this move left it at the current location, which is neither the original place nor the correct spelling of "Joseph". This move request would restore the article to its original place. —Ckatzchatspy 09:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copy edit edit

Performed a general copy edit. There were relatively few issues. I made a few wording changes to appease the "in universe" folks; the article doesn't read as being unnecessarily in-universe to me. (Refer to WP:MOSFICT for guidelines.) Likewise, I removed the original research tag, because under WP:MOSFICT it's accepted that articles detailing the plot of a work of fiction, such as this one, will necessarily use primary sources, e.g., the episodes of the show. Therefore, WP:MOSFICT doesn't consider the use of the TV episodes to build this type of article to be "original research." I don't see any signs of other original research in the article.

There didn't seem to be much cleanup needed, either, although I changed the relationship list into a table so that it's easier to read and takes up less space. Based on that, I removed the "cleanup" tag as well. There are citations on the page, so that tag got changed to {{Refimprove}}; some {{Cite episode}}s would be a good thing, perhaps.

I left the fan-site and plot-summary tags, though I'm not sure I agree with either of them. While the page contains plot summaries, it has to by the nature of the article. I don't find them to be excessive. Likewise, I don't think the article is fannish, any more than any article about a fictional character could be so considered. If others agree, then the tags should be removed after a consensus is formed, eh? // Macwhiz (talk) 21:24, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joey Jeremiah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply