Talk:Joe Miklosi

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

POV Issues in 2012 Congressional Election Section edit

As the election is passed, this is moot for voters, but this section has serious POV issues which should be addressed for the sake of the page's quality. This section is clearly lacking WP:Neutral point of view. I can't tell if it was written to favor or oppose this legislator (it's difficult to tell if it's written from a liberal or conservative bent; still, it is clearly politically-charged), but the language and one-sided listing of endorsements does not achieve the level of neutrality that is appropriate for an encyclopedia.

Thanks for your attention! ToppyT (talk) 17:43, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joe Miklosi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply