This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Regarding the proposed deletion for this article, Gillespie meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. Gillespie is the defensive coordinator on a team in College Football playoff contention, is a finalist for the Broyles Award and has received sufficient significant coverage such as a profile by Fox Sports that is more than just routine coverage to warrant a wikipedia article such as a profile by Fox Sports.
I think overall the case for GNG is borderline, but plausible enough for me to mark this as reviewed without nominating it for deletion. The Fox News source is a good one, but the rest of the coverage, while providing more than mere-mentions, is a bit routine in nature and I could see people arguing that those sources should not contribute to meeting GNG. signed, Rosguilltalk 23:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
