Talk:Joe Biden 1988 presidential campaign

Latest comment: 5 months ago by VintageVernacular in topic Campaign logo
Good articleJoe Biden 1988 presidential campaign has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 12, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Plagiarism edit

According to http://nutsandbolts.washcoll.edu/plagiarism.html, he used a single footnote to cite five full pages of an article, which is inadequate by any academic standard. This sentence in the article, "Biden initially received an “F” in an introductory class on legal methodology for writing a paper relying almost exclusively on a single Fordham Law Review article, which he had cited.", implies that he cited it correctly and was only punished for using a single source. That seems dishonest to me, but perhaps someone could clarify this before I make any changes. Lindentree 19:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

bullshit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.245.63.253 (talk) 07:26, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have changed the article to reflect that the law review article was cited only once. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

[ It was really six full pages. 01:44, November 9, 2020‎ 108.39.66.191 ]

Coal Mines and Football edit

This article leaves out the fact that Biden bizarrely claimed his family had worked in the coal mines, and then come up and played football at the end of long days of work. Apparently true of Kinnock's life, it was not of Biden's: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Rkoqglq9dUArnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 04:26, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Done. Wasted Time R (talk) 09:51, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joe Biden presidential campaign, 1988. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Any verification on that campaign logo in the infobox? VintageVernacular (talk) 05:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nevermind, answering my own question: it can be seen in a photo here, among some other campaign photos. Seems to be a faithful recreation, and I've added a link to that FT article on the WikiCommons file so it's verifiable. VintageVernacular (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply