Talk:Jobbarer Boli Khela

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merger proposal edit

Any Bengali-speaker will be equally familiar with the term boli kusti, in other words kushti or pehlwani. This is yet another nationalistic attempt at fabricating a uniquely Bangladeshi martial art as if Bangladeshi and Indian wrestling are any different. Furthermore, boli khela was not created to fight against the British but existed long before colonization. Who would seriously believe that the freedom fighters would be wrestling against British soldiers armed with guns? Morinae (talk) 13:25, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oppose merging - Boli khela is a uniqe and old traditional game in Bangladesh. It has no relation with kushti or pehlwani. - Rahat | Message 16:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
The link from Banglapedia says boli khela was created during the Mughal period. What originated in Chittagong is the Jabbar-e Boli Khela competition, which is not a separate style but a tournament. Even if you want to retain a separate article, it is a gross exaggeration to say it has "no relation" to kusti. To make a comparison, muay Thai, pradal serey, tomoi, and other Southeast Asian kickboxing styles are essentially the same but have separate articles. Nevertheless, their close similarity is acknowledged in the articles. No boli khela wrestler would deny that he is practicing kusti. To pretend they are totally different with no relation defies logic. And the merge tag should not be removed until the discussion on merging is closed. Morinae (talk) 17:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
There is nothing to be implied from the sport's inception in the Mughal period. The article clearly says "a folk wrestling game unique to Chittagong.", that's enough to prove that Boli Khela is a separate wrestling sport, it may have some relation with Kusti but that doesn't really pose any objection in having a separate article for Boli Khela. Moreover, Boli Khela has an article in an encyclopedia (Banglapedia), this alone proves that it is surely an encyclopedic and notable topic to have a separate article in Wikipedia. --Zayeem (talk) 12:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boli Khela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Boli Khela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply