Talk:Jessie Daniel Ames

Citations

For some reason, my citations #1 and 2 don't automatically appear below, and you can't open them by clicking on them, although I used the same format as in other articles where it worked. I added the Angela Davis book as a source manually.--Parkwells (talk) 17:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I've fixed it. Durova^Charge! 11:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Added more detail, citations and changed some phrasing; removed a few statements because I could not find citations. ZoyaBoris (talk) 00:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Added links and new citations to bibliography. ZoyaBoris (talk) 00:49, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Corrected typo and grammatical error. ZoyaBoris (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Added photo and expanded Info Box ZoyaBoris (talk) 03:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:39, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Texas suffragist Jessie Daniel Ames founded the Association of Southern Women for the Prevention of Lynching in 1930 which appealed directly to white southern women to stop lynching? Source: "In 1930, Ames, with the CIC's financial help, founded the Association of Southern Women for the Prevention of Lynching (ASWPL) with headquarters in Atlanta. The organization excluded African American women and appealed directly to white southern women to stop lynching." ([Ruthe Winegarten, Black Texas Women: 150 Years of Trial and Triumph, Austin: University of Texas Press, 1995])

5x expanded by ZoyaBoris (talk). Self-nominated at 04:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC).

• Note: No QPQ needed, as the nominator has only one DYK credit. RebeccaGreen (talk) 06:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

• The expansion is not showing as large enough for me: just under 2x compared to the needed 5x. That's a shame, as this is a wonderful and well-sourced expansion. The last revision before your edits had a prose size of 3500 characters, and the current revision has 6900. Raymie (t • c) 18:41, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

@ZoyaBoris: Will you be able to bring this to 5x expansion (i.e. around 17500 characters)? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

@Narutolovehinata5: It's going to be difficult to expand the article to 17500 characters. I think that I can expand it to that length but it will take time to do additional research. It's probably better to withdraw the DYK nomination for now. ZoyaBoris (talk) 02:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

ZoyaBoris (talk) 04:19, 23 September 2019 (UTC)