This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 20 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Why is the picture here? It does not depict Jeremy Sivits. Andris 23:55, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
Indeed. Unless there's evidence that Sivits was specifically involved with this particular picture (and the caption doesn't indicate so), it adds absolutely nothing to the article. -- Seth Ilys 00:00, 9 May 2004 (UTC)Reply
The picture is part of the overall incident that the suspects are accused of taking part in. The picture is a very relevant part of the situation involving Jeremy Sivits. --VTEX 01:57, 9 May 2004 (UTC)Reply
Find a picture of him in it and put it here, otherwise let's not use it. The link to the prison article has all of the photos necessary. RickK 02:01, 9 May 2004 (UTC)Reply
