Talk:Jenny Tonge, Baroness Tonge

Untitled

What are Jenny's views on creationism being taught in schools? From the statement in the article it is not clear though it seems to hint that she is pro-creationism.

(The external link to the Epolitix article makes clear that Jenny Tonge is opposed to creationism.)194.75.128.2 15:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Monbiot also made an apology. He deduced that Baroness Tonge is using satire to bring down the house of commons. http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2006/03/24/lady-tonge-an-apology/

Why is Jenny Tonge referred to as Right Honourable? She would surely only have this title if a Privy Councillor (usually a present or former Cabinet minister or leader of an opposition party). I don't know for certain that she is not a PC but if she is then this is sufficiently unusual that further elaboration would be useful. 194.75.128.2 15:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Jenny Tonge is not a Privy Councillor, (just checked the Privy Council Office website). I have therefore removed the designation Right Honourable. Dennett p 15:27, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Although some people feel it is more appropriate to reserve the style 'right honourable' to privy counsellors, all peers in the degrees of lord of parliament, baron, viscount, and earl are style 'right honourable'.--90.206.67.153 (talk) 12:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jenny Tonge.jpg

Image:Jenny Tonge.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Npov

I think some body needs to look at this to make sure it neutral, the Israel Criticism in particular . Any thoughts?安東尼 TALK ^圣诞快乐 22:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Far too long. Two sentences of accusation, two of response, at least two WP:RS, more than adequate. Should have done it myself last time looked, but I think it's doubled in size since then! CarolMooreDC (talk) 14:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Why is the section on controversial comments regarding israel longer than the rest of this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.26.243 (talk) 15:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Rightly or wrongly, it is what she is best known for. I don't think she'd dispute that herself. It's a subject she feels strongly about and has repeatedly campaigned on, particularly since leaving the House of Commons; inevitably, she has drawn criticism as a result. Some might think the current criticism section is a bit excessive, but I think it's justifiable in context. Robofish (talk) 22:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

I made it more NPOV and accurate per WP:BLP per my edit summaries:

• remove what evidently is supposed to be a guilt by association quote, assumedly cause he's NOT talking about dying for Britain)
• renamed section since the section is about criticisms of Israel, some of which are show to have led to controversy; it's WP:OR and NPOV to say controversy and then list mostly criticism
• more clear chrono, accurate facts, less redundant, NPOV of Haitian comments incidents) (undo)
• Corrected inaccurate statement that Tonge being investigated and detail what's investigated why CarolMooreDC 18:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the paragraph about O'Keefe. Not exactly for NPOV (this talk section title), but for OR (synthesism): even the source did not produce anything more connection than that they were on the same meeting. Associations only. -DePiep (talk) 08:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

I agree with the deletion. Really, the O'Keefe material belongs in the O'Keefe article.     ←   ZScarpia   16:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Reverted [1] withouttalk. Still there is not proof of Tonge's resposibility for or connection with O'Keefe's words. -DePiep (talk) 19:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

The only connection we have is a pretty slim one, a complaint by a Haaretz journalist that Tonge didn't dissociate herself from O'Keefe's remarks, remarks that (according to Haaretz) two pro-Israeli activists in the audience asked the police to investigate on the grounds that they promoted racial hatred by comparing Jews to Nazis. I'm rather surprised about Brewcrewer's desire to include the deleted paragraph given the concerns he expressed here.     ←   ZScarpia   19:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

The removal is fine, IMHO :-) CarolMooreDC 04:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Having been made aware of Wikipedia:NPOV#cite_note-0 policy (which links to WP:Criticism essay), it's clear that creating a disjointed chronology to emphasize her criticism of Israel is just too POV and vs. WP:BLP. So I reorganized. Plus clarified that she's still a peer. Did a news archive search of last couple years and there hasn't been a lot about her. Some of the personal details need refs. I'll look at tomorrow. CarolMooreDC 06:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Liberal Democrat membership and other issues

I don't know if it really was Jenny Tonge editing, though the AnonIp does come from United Kingdom Richmond upon Thames. That news source did give the impression she was quitting and a few weeks back when I worked on article I couldn't find one saying she was still a member. Just found a contemporary one now: in passing mention in a Nov. 20, 2012 article about "home allowances".

There does seem to be an impression she quit as in Huffington Post article and Israel National News article. Perhaps she needs to send out a press release saying she's still a member to clear up media confusion. Or at least clue in those sources.

As for removed Yad Vashem info, in this case it was not WP:Undue under WP:Biographies of Living Persons to mention it and the article is far less of an "attack piece" than it was previously and than some other bio articles on this topic are. It does look like a bit more info from the article is warranted under WP:Biographies of Living Persons policies and I'll look at that. Though probably not tonight... CarolMooreDC 04:09, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

2003 Gaza visit and Oona King Guardian OpEd

I looked and Yad Vashem reference is to Oona King's OpEd, even if the letter from Yad Vashem was to both of them. As I corrected, in 2003 Tonge and Oona King visited Gaza and King wrote a long piece for The Guardian (reprint here) comparing it to the Warsaw Ghetto. It is only noted in both Haaretz and Guardian news articles that Tonge said something about the Apartheid, but when and where not identified. Definitely WP:Undue to repeat the criticism of King which is not relevant to Tonge; put it in King's article if you like. CarolMooreDC 05:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but where did you look? The cited Ha'ahretz article says 'Yad Vashem chairman Avner Shalev has accused two British MPs [Identified in the next para as Tonge and King] of "malicious distortion" for comparing the conditions of a million Palestinians trapped in Gaza to the Warsaw Ghetto under Nazi occupation. " and also "Shalev wrote the pair a letter on Sunday saying "whereas it is legitimate to disagree with Israeli policies and actions, it is grossly illegitimate and malicious to compare them to the most evil and massive crime in modern history in order to heighten the disagreement. ". They think it's all over (talk) 18:50, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Again, the sources say that he wrote to both of them, but in fact only King commented on Warsaw Ghetto. And comparing Israel to apartheid has never been equated to comparing it to the Holocaust, has it? Shall we go to WP:BLPN to see if we should burden the article with his response to King - while also making it Tonge only mentioned apartheid? If the source does so, please show us where. Or find one that does. I couldn't. Why not just add it to King article since she's the one who is responsible on the evidence provided?

• The Guardian: The Yad Vashem council has written to Oona King, who is Jewish and the Labour MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, and Jenny Tonge, the Liberal Democrat MP for Richmond Park, who said they were shocked by what they saw during a visit to Gaza earlier this month.

Ms King wrote a commentary nearly a fortnight ago in the Guardian drawing the analogy with the Warsaw ghetto to which Jews were confined by the Germans.

Haaretz - which seems to be a short version of the McGreal article: Yad Vashem chairman Avner Shalev has accused two British MPs of "malicious distortion" for comparing the conditions of a million Palestinians trapped in Gaza to the Warsaw Ghetto under Nazi occupation.

Oona King, MP (Labor), and MP Jenny Tonge, MP (Liberal Democrats), visited the Gaza Strip about two weeks ago and said they were shocked by what they saw.

Oona King original in Guardian: ...As two British MPs travelling with Christian Aid, myself and Jenny Tonge are alarmed. For Gaza residents this is business as usual. More than 1 million Palestinians live on this tiny piece of land (smaller than the Isle of Wight) - more than three-quarters of on less than £1.30 a day. Life below the poverty line for these Palestinians contrasts with the 5,000 Israeli settlers who occupy one-third of the land and enjoy watered gardens, first world housing and protection by the Israeli army. This protection means Palestinians wait for hours - sometimes days - at Israeli checkpoints, trying to find work or get access to essential services such as medical care.

The sun is setting on Gaza. From my hotel balcony I hear demonstrations in the street below. It occurs to me that I can put on a headscarf and slip into the crowd as a Palestinian. No one will guess I’m Jewish, still less that I’m a British MP...

A proper interpretation of the reliable source makes it clear that there is no evidence for what the Yad Vashem representative charged vs Tonge and a proper summary of what is written makes that clear. CarolMooreDC 19:15, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

What you are doing here ('A proper interpretation of the reliable source') is called original research. The reliable source(s) Ha'aretz (and Guardian) , says Shalev wrote to both MPs and accused both of an improper comparison. Carol Moore, who is not a reliable source, thinks Shalev was wrong to do this, since only King made a direct comparison to the Ghetto, and that Ha'aretz should have clarified this. But we don't write according to what you think would have been a better criticism, we write according to what the reliable sources actually say and what Shalev actually did. And they accurately report that Shalev criticized Tonge for making a Nazi comparison. They think it's all over (talk) 19:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

As I clearly said, per BLP you must summarize what the Guardian says (the original, earlier and more complete source, though Haaretz presents essentially same info). IF you do so it becomes clear there is no evidence that Tonge mentioned the Warsaw Ghetto, only that Shalev accused them both of it. Sure, this is the sort of thing that is emphasized on partisan websites trying to destroy people's reputation, but is it suitable under WP:BLP for Wikipedia? That's what the issue would be at WP:BLPN. CarolMooreDC 20:43, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I think a fair summary of what the Guardian or Ha'artez say is what you removed from the article- namely, that Shalev criticized Tonge (and King) for making inappropriate comparisons to Nazi Germany. neither Ha'artez nor the Guardian is a partisan websites trying to destroy people's reputation. WP:BLP says 'If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well-documented, it belongs in the article — even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. ' - this is clearly an incident that meets all 3 requirements (noteworthy, relevant, and well-documented) They think it's all over (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Just because he criticized it, is no reason not to make it clear that King alone wrote the OpEd and that Tonge's only relevant comment in relation to the trip to Gaza was saying Israel practiced Apartheid, which is not relevant to the Holocaust. That is necessary under WP:BLP or one might be accused of partisan POV pushing. Have you bothered to do research to show that she did say more? CarolMooreDC 04:42, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

What she said was already in the article - but you keep on removing the sourced criticism. Why are you doing that? They think it's all over (talk) 00:22, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

BLP Noticeboard entry

Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Jenny_Tonge.2C_Baroness_Tonge. CarolMooreDC 02:24, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Marked with green check per below. CarolMooreDC 15:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

New sources

OK, I thought I'd searched highbeam, but putting in the two MPs names actually gave me at least two or more good sources, at least one of which does quote what Tonge actually said on Warsaw Ghetto. Again proving that sourcing is everything. So I'll redo per those. CarolMooreDC 15:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Controversy

Why is "Her support for the Palestinian people and criticism of Israel" controversial? Surely she is entitled to her opinion, and criticism of Israel is not illegal?203.184.41.226 (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

It isn't, but if you read the article, it explains how her outspoken views have caused controversy. Without wanting to get into that controversy here, it seems fair to say they go considerably beyond the position of her former party, the Liberal Democrats, on the subject, and attracted them much criticism until she resigned the whip. Robofish (talk) 22:36, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Pronunciation?

Article should give some indication of how her surname is pronounced... -- AnonMoos (talk) 04:26, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Campaign Against Antisemitism

Currently, the Wikipedia article on the Campaign Against Antisemitism, which is linked to from the current article, is little more than a stub. There is more information on Powerbase here. Powerbase also has an article on the Campaign's chairman, Gideon Falter, and spokesman, Jonathan Sacerdoti, here and here. Falter was at the centre of the prosecution of Foreign Office diplomat Rowan Laxton (the "Ranting Diplomat") for comments Falter and one other alleged he had made in a gym while watching a news report about the killing of a farmer in Gaza. Later, at a Crown Court appeal, a judge and two magistrates decided that Laxton had not made the comment on which the prosectution relied.[2][3][4] According to this Electronic Intifada article, the BBC Trust determined that the way Sacerdoti had been used in the reporting of Operation Pillar of Cloud in 2012 had breached BBC impartiality guidelines (other articles by the same author are here and here). The breach related to the failure to make clear Sacerdoti's activism on behalf of Israel ("... the interviewee was introduced without sufficient context. The BBC had not made clear to the audience that the interviewee was associated with a particular viewpoint and this had resulted in a breach of Impartiality guideline 4.4.14."[5]). Tony Greenstein wrote about the Campaign Against Antisemitism here.     ←   ZScarpia   00:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

'Haiti organ harvesting claims false'

User Epson Slats has cited this Jerusalem Post article in order state as a fact that allegations made in The Palestine Telegraph about organ harvesting by the IDF were false. However the body of that newspaper article source doesn't support the falsity claim; the only part which remotely does is the article title, and that is presented as an unattributed quote. Hopefully, an attempt to argue that such meagre support constitutes a reliable source will not be made. Note that no inquiry into the claims was launched, nor (as far as memory serves) did any Israeli authority figure officially comment on them. The wording of the rest of the section makes clear the shaky basis on which the claims were made, allowing readers to draw their own conclusions.     ←   ZScarpia   12:15, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

The headline clearly says the claims were false, which should be enough. One must wonder, if they claims were not false, why would there be a problem with Tonge;s comments. But as we all know, including the tendentious editors removing this sourced material, they were of course false, as the source says . Removing sourced material again will be reported. Epson Salts (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Try re-reading my intitial comment. It should be obvious that the headline is not a reliable source for stating something as a fact in the current article when the contents of that headline are not backed up in the text of what follows, particularly when that headline is presented in the form of an unattributed quote, which means that the newspaper isn't claiming in its own voice that what is stated is a fact. Contrary to what you claim, the headline on its own is not enough. One must wonder? Best to use somewhere else for speculations. One should provide proper reliable sources.     ←   ZScarpia   18:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

On the contrary, It should be obvious that the headline of a news item form a mainstream newspaper is a reliable source. If you doubt that, please point to the relevant policy that says otherwise, or take it to WP:RSN. I will be restoring this shortly, along with additional sources that say the same thing. Tell me, tendentious editor, if the claims were not false- why was Tonge sacked, why was it even an issue? Epson Salts (talk) 18:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Do me the courtesy of keeping your personal comments about me off Wikipedia. As I've repeatedly requested, please do provide proper sources for what you want to state. You've continued to ignore the point that the headline doesn't present the falsity of the claims as a fact rather than something that someone unknown has, supoosedly, said.     ←   ZScarpia   19:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Do me the courtesy of actually looking at the edits- I've added two more sources that directly call the claims 'false' or 'baseless'. One of these sources is a scholarly press. If you tendentiously remove such high quality sources, I will call you a tendentious editor. Epson Salts (talk) 21:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

• You can use the YNet source to quote what people had to say about the claims, but, as it doesn't itself say that the claims were false, you cannot cite it in order to state that as a fact in the article.
• Quote the whole text from p.185 of "Drawing Fire" which you're using as the basis of your claims. Note that Tonge only said that an enquiry should be carried out into the claims so that they could be discounted if not true, she didn't claim they were true. Note that, in the Jerusalem Post article, Tonge is quoted as saying of the organ harvesting allegations: "It is quite ludicrous – organs would be useless in that situation anyway and it is a nonsense suggestion." If Buffer wrote that she "gave credence" to them, he's not representing the situation truely. Does Buffer explain why the accusations are false or justify stating that? Or is it presented merely as his personal opinion?

    ←   ZScarpia   23:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

The Ynet source does not quote anyone, it states as fact that the claims were false. "Drawing Fire" similarly writes that the claims were baseless- that's all we need to know. The article doesn't say Tonge said the claims were true- it says The Pal Telegraph, whom she was a patron of, published false claims. This is backed up by 3 sources. Your tendentiousness notwithstanding, we are done here. Epson Salts (talk) 02:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

As far as the YNet article goes, I see that, at the bottom, it does say that the AfriSynergy Productions video referred to by Lendman "recycle(s) false claims that IDF soldiers engage in organ trafficking."     ←   ZScarpia   18:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

The sources clearly state as fact that the allegations are false. I'm the 3rd editor to state this quite obvious fact, vs one editor who continues to BLUDGEON. Barring more editors participating, there's no point in continuing this. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 03:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

One of those users hasn't responded to requests to argue their case on this talkpage. Two of those haven't bothered too provide counter-reasoning. Without presenting your reasoning, all your claims are just flatulence. Put up or stick a bung in it. The first two sources don't support the statement of fact you're trying to make; the third is alright, albeit it's probably libellous. Nice use superlativisation by the way!     ←   ZScarpia   19:25, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

All 3 sources directly support the claim. Saying that a respectable scholar is committing libel in a book by an academic press is such a gross WP:BLP violation that you should be banned, right here and now. I suspect that not long in coming given your recent editing. Epson Salts (talk) 22:49, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

gr8 b8 m8. Too bad none of your complaints are grounded in wikipedia policy, eh? By the way, in your 3rd edit of the above comment [6], in what was apparently an attempt to get the snark just right, you misplaced an "of". 4th time's a charm! No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

And so to the [7] we go.     ←   ZScarpia   22.38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

User Mezigue, please justify the claim you made when carrying out your revert that the sources "clearly do say it."     ←   ZScarpia   18:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

From The Jewish Chronicle[8]: 'An Israeli Embassy spokesman dismissed the allegations as “not fit to grace even the sickest of publications”. The allegations came in an article titled Focus on Israel: Harvesting Haitian Organs by an American researcher, Stephen Lendman, who accused Israel of a “crime against humanity”.'     ←   ZScarpia   19:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

The Electronic Intifada - Jillian C. York - Israeli media first to report Haitian organ theft rumor, 19 February 2010.

The Guardian - Uri Dromi - Comment is Free: A Lib Dem and a blood libel, 12 February 2010: "A rumour of Israel 'harvesting' organs in Haiti, given credence by Jenny Tonge, belongs to a baleful tradition of antisemitic lies."
Haaretz - U.K. Lawmaker 'Fired Over Claims IDF Harvested Organs in Haiti', 14 February 2010: "Baroness Jenny Tonge, a Liberal Democrat lawmaker in Britain, has been fired from her position as party health spokesperson for urging a probe into claims that Israel Defense Forces soldiers harvested organs in Haiti following last month's earthquake, the Guardian reported on Saturday. ... The report added that Tonge made her accusations about the IDF mission in Haiti in the online Palestine Telegraph - of which she is a patron."

There appears to be doubt whether the Palestine Telegraph piece by Stephen Lendman did actually make claims about organ harvesting or whether it just reported that such claims were being made. Jenny Tonge was reported as having had this to say in the cited Jerusalem Post article: '“This is total rubbish, as usual! Palestine Telegraph last week had a long piece by a Jewish American on the subject of organ donation – not an editorial piece,” Tonge said in the e-mail. “It said there were postings on YouTube about organ harvesting in Haiti by the large team sent out by Israel to help! The JC asked for a comment, as I am a patron of the Palestine Telegraph. I actually congratulated Israel for their prompt response to the disaster and said that if allegations were being made they should conduct an inquiry to dispel any rumors. OK? It is quite ludicrous – organs would be useless in that situation anyway and it is a nonsense suggestion.' However, the piece Lendman wrote on his blog about organ harvesting allegations (Focus on Israel: Harvesting Haitian Organs), though it mostly reports what others have said, does conclude near the end that what was being alleged about IDF activities in Haiti contained truth: "Its medical teams apparently are doing it in Haiti, exploiting fresh corpses and the living." Towards the middle of the blog piece, Lendman says that in 2002 Israeli journalists broke news of a scandal involving organ trafficking by the Abu Kabir Forensic Institute, which probably bears on the credence he gives to activities in Haiti.     ←   ZScarpia   23:25, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Online articles about the harvesting of organs by the Abu Kabir Forensic Institute near Tel Aviv:

See the talkpage for the Abu Kabir Forensic Institute article

The Guardian - Ian Black - Doctor admits Israeli pathologists harvested organs without consent, 21 December 2009. Counterpunch - Nancy Scheper-Hughes - Body Parts and Bio-Piracy, 25 October 2010: "Dr. Scheper-Hughes says her purpose here is to refute the controversial official statements of the Ministry of Health and the IDF that while there may have been irregularities at the National Forensic Institute, they have long since ended. To this day, she says, they have failed to acknowledge, punish, or rectify various medical human rights abuses, past and present at the National Forensic Institute. While many of the allegations are widely known, the testimony by Israeli state pathologist and IDF (reserve) Lt. Col. Chen Kugel has never been published in English and his allegations are known only within Israel. Dr. Scheper-Hughes invited Dr. Kugel to speak publicly on this topic in the U.S. on May 6, 2010." WRMEA - Alison Weir - Israeli Organ Harvesting: From Moldova To Palestine, p.15, November 2009.     ←   ZScarpia   17:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC) None of the above has any relevance to what we are discussing, but it help ius better understand what kind of person you are. Epson Salts (talk) 02:20, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

After having indicated on the NPOV noticeboard that he would accept the word "baseless"[9], the exact adjective used in the third source, Epson Salts reverted here using the edit summary, "Your refusal to let this go made me change my mind. This phrasing is better, and it is fully supported by 3 sources, and a consensus of editors on the Talk page)."     ←   ZScarpia   10:47, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Request for correction of penultimate paragraph to ensure an accurate account

The penultimate paragraph starting "Tonge chaired a meeting of the Palestine Return Council at the House of Lords - - -" needs changing, for two reasons: (a) as it stands it does not report the content, the topic and other important aspects of the meeting, and; (b) it misleadingly suggests Tonge was in a position to "reproach or redress" a member of the audience (not one of the invited speakers) who it alleges to have claimed Jews ‘provoked’ their own genocide. She was in no position to "reproach or redress" the person in question, as he spoke rapidly and in a fashion that made him virtually incomprehensible. I was an eye-witness to all this.

The meeting was seriously misreported in the Press, creating considerable irritation among those who attended. Many of these can, if required, attest to what I state here.

I ask that the penultimate paragraph be redrafted as follows:

"On October 25th 2016 she chaired a meeting in the House of Lords organised by the Palestinian Return Centre. The purpose was to launch a campaign to get the UK government to apologise for not fulfilling the second part of the Balfour Declaration, which says “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine”. During the meeting a member of the audience, a rabbi from the Neturei Karta sect of Judaism, made a barely audible and muddled speech that the Chair ignored, before giving another audience member the opportunity to speak. The next morning press reports appeared blaming the chair for not silencing the rabbi’s allegedly anti-Semitic comments. The Liberal Democrats suspended her from the party immediately, but without investigating the matter. Bs Tonge chose to resign, and now sits as an Independent peer in the House of Lords".Melepsipo (talk) 12:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

You have to bring WP:RS for your claims.Shrike (talk) 12:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jenny Tonge, Baroness Tonge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100223030310/http://www.paltelegraph.com/opinions/views/3938-focus-on-israel-harvesting-haitian-organs-by-stephen-lendman to http://www.paltelegraph.com/opinions/views/3938-focus-on-israel-harvesting-haitian-organs-by-stephen-lendman

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jenny Tonge, Baroness Tonge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130416053706/http://www.trust.org/trustlaw/news/uk-mps-call-on-government-to-act-decisively-to-stop-child-marriage to http://www.trust.org/trustlaw/news/uk-mps-call-on-government-to-act-decisively-to-stop-child-marriage

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jenny Tonge, Baroness Tonge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131112095214/http://www.tripolipost.com/articledetail.asp?c=1&i=9546 to http://www.tripolipost.com/articledetail.asp?c=1&i=9546

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Untitled

Regarding the 25 October 2016 meeting of the Palestine Return Council at the House of Lords (that Baroness Tonge chaired), the entry fails to state that she was completely exonerated by the Lords Commissioners after they investigated and examined a video of the event. The citation is https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201617/ldselect/ldprivi/142/142.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.90.182.99 (talk) 16:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Not reliable source: Kennedy, Dominic (27 October 2016). "Jews blamed for Holocaust at 'shameful' House of Lords event". The Times.

I suggest that the citation for the article, Kennedy, Dominic (27 October 2016). "Jews blamed for Holocaust at 'shameful' House of Lords event". The Times, be replaced.
1. It was the subject of a succesful complaint to the Independent Press Standards Organisation.
2. It was at the centre of antisemitism claims made against the Palestine Return Centre which were dismissed on investigation. [10][11][12][13]
3. It, or a similar article by Marcus Dysch in The Jewish Chronicle[14][15], were used in a book by Tom Bower which was serialised in The Mail on Sunday, which later caused the book to be amended and the newspaper to pay damages.[16]
    ←   ZScarpia   15:19, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Tonge's retirement & proposal for section on comments regarding Jews that do not concern Israel

It seems to me that this page might benefit from at least two modifications. The first is that Baroness Tonge has announced that she will retire from the House of Lords on February 19th, 2021. ; see also e.g. .

The second is that a number of the remarks she has made which have engendered allegations of anti-Semitism cannot properly be understood as "comments about Israel" and/or "comments about the Gaza Strip". For example, in a tweet on August 11, 2018 that has attracted criticism, she asks: "Why have the Jewish people been persecuted over and over again throughout history? Why? I never get an answer. If we discussed this, we would be accused of anti Semitism [sic], so better not, and so it goes on!" The phrase "over and over again throughout history" makes clear that the question is not limited to persecution from 1948 onwards; it is therefore inaccurate to include this under the heading "Comments about Israel and the Gaza strip (2012–present)". Perhaps it might be most appropriate to have a heading that reads "allegations of anti-semitism"? I appreciate consideration of this matter by the wider community of editors who seem to be monitoring this page. Publius In The 21st Century (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

References

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 September 2021

Please add a note that she is author to her autobiography “Pit Banks to Red Benches” published by Louisa Publications in September 2021. For evidence search all main online bookshops or Amazon. 82.132.239.224 (talk) 14:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 December 2021

Change Deputy leader of the Labour Party to Deputy Leader of the Labour Party please!

It is not consistent. House of Nobles (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

@House of Nobles: I can't find what you're referring to. The word "deputy" shows up once in the article in reference to Tom Watson, and the capitalization there is fine. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 15:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

The Hyperlink is showing Deputy leader of the Labour Party not Deputy Leader of the Labour Party. House of Nobles (talk) 22:17, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

That's a redirect, but  Done cuz why not. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 10:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC)