| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jean-Marie Abgrall article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
45,000 euro deal edit
cultnews.com is a site published by an anti-cult activist, and does not cite the source for the allegation that this person was paid to produce a positive report about Landmark Education. I can't really consider this source reliable for this claim. This is a biography of a living person; it is important that this arguably negative claim be properly referenced. I have tagged the claim as dubious until this can be resolved. -- Beland 23:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- This is referenced in numerous other French publications, I believe some of them are on the film's page as well. And Cult News is also carried by a very wide circulation paper, The Post Chronicle. Smeelgova 00:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC).
If we go that way, I would like to make sure that the claim he is a psychiatrist and a forensic be properly documented. As far as I understood from J.H. Matelly's publications, nobody seems to have seen this gentleman's credentials. Alphast 15:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
Notability edit
4 high quality secondary sources, how is this not demonstrating notability? Zambelo; talk 10:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Ref 1 goes to some weird website. Ref 2 is not a reliable source. Ref 3 is a non-notable television documentary in which he appears briefly. Ref 4. is more substantial, but not enough. --Randykitty (talk) 11:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Ref 1. is from Libération, a major French Newspaper. 2. is a mirror of a an official court document 3 sure is notable 4. is substantial. I have also added three more scholarly references. Zambelo; talk 23:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- 1 does not go to Liberation (just click it), 2 is a primary source. --Randykitty (talk) 22:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
I've fixed 1 secondary sources for 2 upcoming. Apart from that there are 6 secondary sources, including a book written about his theories. Zambelo; talk 06:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)