Talk:Jayant Sinha

Neutrality of political information

The section "Ministerial career" reads like a glowing endorsement of this minister, uncritically presenting press talking points as fact. This article is in need of more critical and careful evaluation of his successes and failures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.106.1.155 (talk) 05:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Efforts have been made from my side to remove "POLITICALLY MOTIVATED" or "NON-NEUTRAL" information. I was expecting you to please check the page and decide whether the neutrality flag can now be removed or not. Ashwanikm190805 (talk) 17:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

When did he receive his MBA?

If anyone knows, insert the year please. Haberstr (talk) 11:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Jayant Sinha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140521023031/http://eciresults.nic.in:80/ConstituencywiseS2714.htm?ac=14 to http://eciresults.nic.in/ConstituencywiseS2714.htm?ac=14
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150118092956/http://eciresults.nic.in:80/statewiseS27.htm?st=S27 to http://eciresults.nic.in/statewiseS27.htm?st=S27
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140520091449/http://www.theindianrepublic.com:80/tbp/can-unite-nation-100026328.html to http://www.theindianrepublic.com/tbp/can-unite-nation-100026328.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Establishing neutrality of the Page about this political figure.

Taking in record, observations by some Wikipedians that the page was not presenting neutral information, I have tried to make some efforts in neutralizing it for the greater benefit of the reader by removing politically motivated information and achievements, awards earned in University/school, etc. Some content may still not be "neutral" recommendations are invited, if any point is missing please let me know. Ashwanikm190805 (talk) 17:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

To remove large chunk of content just because it "is already covered in the info box" is inappropriate. It is necessary to explain infobox content in article body. Overall, the article may need some copy editing but no mass content removal. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 04:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Information like he being an "investment fund manager and management consultant" or about awards he won as a "college student" or that he represented his school in various "quizzes and debates" is just an attempt to glorify his image and present him as a "great politician" something a biographical page should not have it should represent only neutral and unbiased info. Moreover the section "Development of Hazaribagh" is just like an advertisement for an election campaign. Opening hospitals, is not relevant information keeping in mind he is a politician and would have inaugurated many schemes. Ashwanikm190805 (talk) 06:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

We can't and shouldn't disregard his academical/professional(career) achievements. Talking about the developmental works that he has carried out in his constituency shouldn't be removed; in such a case you have to tag many articles on Indian Politicians on Wikipedia . I don't see any bias. We are making his biography here we have to include every bit of information. Its unfortunate that few editors have given a political angle to it. By the way will you please explain who are these "some wikipedians. I only see 2 (excluding me) to have at least debated on it.LALAJI1234 (talk) 13:53, 28 October 2021 (UTC)