Talk:Japanese destroyer Kiri (1944)/GA1

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Pickersgill-Cunliffe in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 09:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look at this shortly. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Prelim edit

  • Navy list is a duplicated link
  • No edit wars
  • Was File:Momi II.jpg actually published prior to 1957?
    • No idea, but the Japanese copyright requires either published or taken before 1957.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Earwig reports copyvio unlikely

Lede and infobox edit

  • "miod-1944" sp
  • Move convoy link to first mention
  • "Kiri returned home" not clear where home is
  • Are we sure the ship was commissioned on the day of her acquisition by the Soviets?

Design and description edit

  • IJN acronym isn't explained anywhere
  • "The single mount was partially protected against spray by a gun shield" this suggests the other mount didn't have a gun shield, but from the image it looks as if it did?

Construction and career edit

  • Suggest linking Battle off Cape Engaño again
  • I would have expected the "admiral" in "Vice-admiral" to be capitalised
  • Did the ship do anything particular in the battle, or is her role recorded?
    • Only that she had a problem refueling the day before the battle. She's not mentioned as doing anything in any of my sources.
  • "slightly damaged the following day" by what?
    • Combined Fleet says that they don't know by what. All I can guess is that it was not by American action as it doesn't line up with any American attacks on that date. Could have been something like grounding on a sandbar.
  • Main text suggests that the rescuing of Yūzuki's crew happens on 12 December, but the ship sank on 23 December per her infobox?
    • Definitely 12 December. I'll fix that ship's article accordingly
  • "on 17 June" needs the year
  • Do we have any idea what the ship was doing in Soviet service? The paragraph currently reads like a calendar
    • Agreed, but there's nothing out there better detailing her activities during this time.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Suggest linking hulked
  • "3 October 1957" no need for repeated year

References edit

  • References look good. AGF on print sources.
  • What makes www.combinedfleet.com a reliable source?
    • The website is owned and run by Jon Parshall, a published historian on the IJN

@Sturmvogel 66: Hi, that's all I have for now. Will await your responses. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

All done, see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply