This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Since 1969 this trend has been repeated 32 of a possible 39 times Not everybody agrees that this is significant: for example this page quotes more like 67% on the TSX. And this page shows a linear regression that appears to be almost random (R2=0.09) ... the top three Google hits call it "a market myth" and "underperformer". I question whether it is wise to leave this article without a strong disclaimer. Steipe (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
