 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move to Jan Roháč z Dubé. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 07:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Jan Rohac of Dube → Jan Roháč z Dubé —(Discuss)— diacritics and overwhelming use; anyway, it's a genitive suffix, actual English would be "of Dubá" —Malyctenar 14:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Survey
editAdd "* Support" or "* Oppose" i(or whatever) in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Alternate move The article has no problem calling its subject Roháč and Jan Roháč appears to be unambiguous. Move to Jan Roháč. and link Dubá. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support either proposed move. Olessi 20:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Jan.Kamenicek 18:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Names should, imho, be in their native language, with redirection links to them from the English if there's a difference. --Michael Noel Jones 19:18, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.