I appreciate your work, but please be careful with deletion of huge chunks of referenced informtion. I restored the section for now. It needs a more careful processing In particular, as a result of the merge several redirects were created to boldfaced terms. There is also an internal wikilink to the section. Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 09:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
- P.S. As I briefly looked, the sources cited tell a more detailed and interesting political history of this ephemeral establishment, while others are irrelevant. Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 09:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
- There is no reason to include article within article. The part you restored doesn't add anything substantial, it basically repeats everything what already is included in the article. Marcelus (talk) 09:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
- It basically repeats what you added, but you missed something. That's why I restotred it, for further processing. And it is not called article within article. It is section within article. Anyway, I DGAF for political topics. Lokys dar Vienas (talk) 10:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
