Talk:Jameson's mamba/GA1
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dracophyllum (talk · contribs) 08:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
I'm happy to do this review :) Dracophyllum 08:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Review edit
Some notes to start:
a) Specific name > specific epithet
b) "and generally uncorrected by subsequent authors." is this in one of the refs?
c) "pointed the correct spelling" > corrected the spelling to
d) ref 7 could me expanded a bit
e) the image doesn't have a caption
f) subcaudal > wiktionary linked
- linked at first instance to WP page - generally only use Wikt when WP lacking~~
g) can we get a phylogeny? I can make it for you if you want.
h) "The general consensus is" is this reffed?
i) "The number and pattern of scales on a snake's body are a key element of identification to species level" > The number and pattern of scales on a snake's body play a key role in the identification and differentiation at the species level.
j) link sedentary
k) anod ??
l) breeding sec > one para
m) link cisticolas
n) SubSaharan > Sub-Saharan
Criteria edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
a) Earwig is clean when you take into account that the 95% similarity websites are just copying wp.
b) I don't really have any more suggestions, so will probably pass this in a sec Dracophyllum 23:46, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
c) Final comment: Article meets GA criteria - well done cas! Dracophyllum 00:30, 20 August 2021 (UTC)