Talk:James Steven Ginsburg

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 in topic What evidence do we have that someone close to this article wrote it?

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Steven Ginsburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

What evidence do we have that someone close to this article wrote it? edit

If there is no evidence provided within a week, I think it's fair to remove the thing at the top of the article. GreenFrogsGoRibbit (talk) 06:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • There's no question, per the two connected contributors templates you'll find at the top of this talk page, GreenFrogsGoRibbit. The more relevant question is whether the article retains a neutral tone, or bears the effects of COI editing. If it looks okay, there's no reason to keep the tag on the article. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply