Talk:James McCune Smith/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
A rather short article (despite its spectacularly long lede), that has various missing citations, cites the census (generally unreliable) and Answers.com. Further, it should incorporate the further reading articles to be considered comprehensive. I'm willing to conduct a fuller review if a user is willing to respond to more specific comments. Otherwise, as it stands this article should be de-listed. Best, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:51, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

• Much time has elapsed, and there is no indication of the problems being resolved. De-listing and assessing as C, if a user resolves the problems, they are welcome to re-nominate the article for GA. Best, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)