This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I have changed "bequeathed" to "was bequeathed" because it's the only thing that makes sense. There is no source for the bequeathing of 20,000 pounds, so the entire sentence is doubtful. The article is lacking sources for a lot of the claims. Akld guy (talk) 20:20, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Not only that, it did not had the right tone, which was probably a result of the translation from the Spanish article. I've done some copy-editing to make it more encyclopedic. I've also added sources, but the problem is: there aren't many. Primarily, there are two books, both of which are not viewable online, and a Discovery Channel documentary of which only a poor quality copy, cut in 5 parts, can be found on YouTube. I was actually quite excited when I saw this article, and if I had more time, I would probably have written it myself. Many years ago, I saw the Discovery Channel documentary on YouTube, and to me, it left very little doubt. If you look through the sensational narration and the dramatic music, the evidence presented was quite convincing, and I find it highly likely that James Kelly is the true identity of Jack the Ripper. I was quite surprised to read that many people still didn't believe it, despite an impressive pile of clues which host Ed Norris presented. Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 21:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
