Talk:James Chilton

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Susanna as Chilton's wife's name edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Chilton's first wife's name is disputed. It keeps getting inserted in references that in fact, do not state her name as Susanna. At this time, her name is unknown. There are descendants in the family with that name but the wife's name is still unknown, at least in the references given. Mugginsx (talk) 12:43, 19 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure that use of the term "separatist" is appropriately applied to the Pilgrims. This is a group of people persecuted for their religious beliefs, who left England in order to preserve their lives and their freedom. It was not a voluntary separation, and their intention when they left, and for years after, was to return. To say they escaped might be more accurate. Are Christians and Jews fleeing Iran "separatists"? I hardly think so. "Refugees" might be a better term. 2001:5B0:29FF:1EF0:0:0:0:3D (talk) 19:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:29FF:1EF0:0:0:0:3D (talk) 19:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Separatist is the historic term used as evidenced by the references given. Mugginsx (talk) 10:54, 13 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Chilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121101172604/http://www.plimoth.org/media/pdf/chilton_james.pdf to http://www.plimoth.org/media/pdf/chilton_james.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic