Talk:James Cartwright
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James Cartwright article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Strangely, General Cartwright's official photo in this article has been altered. It differs from the source official photo currently on the DefenseLink site. The top left and bottom right award ribbons in the Wikipedia copy have been modified.
72.83.122.150 (talk) 20:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
BLP issues edit
I don't think any of that overcomes the BLP requirement so please do not add before it gets a lot more solid. Hcobb (talk) 14:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- More of the same, nothing really solid.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/25/inside-the-ring-377211977/?page=2
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on James Cartwright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120721002740/http://www.globalzero.org/en/us-nuclear-policy-commission-report to http://www.globalzero.org/en/us-nuclear-policy-commission-report
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
More on the WHY of the Leak edit
I came here straight from the Article on "Stuxnet", where Cartwright is mentioned. I wonder if there is any RS telling the story of WHY Cartwright leaked the information. Was it for personal gain? Was it authorized by the Obama Administration? Was it part of a larger "operation". As a Reader, all this stuff is very interesting, I'd just like some more. Is there more to be had?Tym Whittier (talk) 08:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)