Fallacious section removed edit

Helo, I have removed a section of this article which is basically comprised of nothing but fallacious comments and pure speculation and puffery. There is no real historical basis or evidence for such claims and even the quotation given is not that of a proper scholar/historian but of a political supporter and follower/partisan of the subject. Please, I hope that editors will refrain from such dubious activity, thanks . 39.54.204.218 (talk) 15:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Col (r) Mumtaz Khan, PakistanReply


BOONDOCKS — Preceding unsigned comment added by NineTales00 (talkcontribs) 20:11, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply