 | Jagdgeschwader II has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 9, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jagdgeschwader II article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A fact from Jagdgeschwader II appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 January 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
source review tips edit
To check as many errors as possible in the references and/or notes, I recommend using User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck in conjunction with two other scripts. You can install them as follows:
- First, copy/paste
importScript('User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js');to Special:MyPage/common.js . - On the same page and below that script add
importScript('User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck.js');. Save that page. - Finally go to to Special:MyPage/common.css and add
.citation-comment {display: inline !important;} /* show all Citation Style 1 error messages */.
When you've added all those, go to an article to check for various messages in its notes and references. (You may need to clear your browser's cache first). The output of User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck is not foolproof and can be verbose. Use common sense when interpreting output (especially with respect to sorting errors). Reading the explanatory page will help more than a little. The least urgent message of all is probably Missing archive link; archiving weblinks is good practice but lack of archiving will probably not be mentioned in any content review. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 04:14, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Jagdgeschwader II/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 08:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 08:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Criteria edit
GA Criteria
|
|---|
|
GA Criteria:
|
- No DAB links
- No Dead links
Prose Suggestions edit
- When the war ended on 11 November 1918, the wing's personnel began to straggle home. suggest When the war ended on 11 November 1918, the wing's personnel began to return home.
- Rewritten.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Operational history edit
- Jagdgeschwader II (Fighter Wing II, or JG II) came into being because suggest Jagdgeschwader II (Fighter Wing II, or JG II) was created because
- but were beginning to receive Fokker Dr.1 triplanes on 16 February. suggest either but were beginning to receive Fokker Dr.1 triplanes by 16 February. or else but began to receive Fokker Dr.1 triplanes on 16 February.
- Done.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:19, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Georgejdorner: That is all my suggestions, passing now. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)