Talk:Jacksonville Tea Men

Fair use rationale for Image:Jacksonville Tea Men.gif

Image:Jacksonville Tea Men.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

First major league team

The line about the Tea Men being Jacksonville's first major-league level sports team is sourced to this article from The Florida-Times Union, the region's newspaper of record and a reliable source. The footnote is included at the end of the paragraph where the line appears in the article body (it's in fact the very first citation). It is standard procedure to (1) not include footnotes in the introduction if they're in the article body and (2) to include cites at the end of a paragraph if it all comes from the same source. Hopefully that clears it up.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for finally making that clear. 74.178.230.234 (talk) 05:22, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't know what else to tell you, this is the standard way of footnoting sources. I am glad you understand now.Cúchullain ^t/c 13:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Recent edits

I've reverted a series of recent edits by Teamenowner. Unfortunately, the edits were uncited and altered material that was already cited to reliable sources, so it can't be included in that state. If the user can provide some reliable sources for the material we can discuss how better to include them.--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC)