This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Latest comment: 9 days ago3 comments3 people in discussion
There really should be some mention of her reluctance to prosecute Ed Buck. It was a high-profile case which Jackie came under fire for. 144.178.0.128 (talk) 03:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC) DarwinReply
Thank you for adding it. I believe that case was a major factor in her not getting re-elected.
Also, a previous edit removed the part about her husband pulling a gun on protesters. It's back now. That detail is very relevant since it occurred the night before the election. 144.178.0.146 (talk) 02:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC) DarwinReply
The section on Buck is ludicrously long and overly-detailed.
The page of George Gascon fails to mention any of the much worse controversies.
The section on Buck should be shortened significantly.
The idea that the Ed Buck case played virtually any role in George Gascon's come from behind victory in the 2020 general election is absurd. 2603:9001:4200:E2D1:7421:F2F9:AAB9:DD86 (talk) 21:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
