Talk:Jackie Lacey

Latest comment: 9 days ago by 2603:9001:4200:E2D1:7421:F2F9:AAB9:DD86 in topic Ed Buck

Draft:Jackie Lacey edit

Please consider incorporating any useful material from this submission. ~KvnG 00:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ed Buck edit

There really should be some mention of her reluctance to prosecute Ed Buck. It was a high-profile case which Jackie came under fire for. 144.178.0.128 (talk) 03:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC) DarwinReply

Thank you for adding it. I believe that case was a major factor in her not getting re-elected.
Also, a previous edit removed the part about her husband pulling a gun on protesters. It's back now. That detail is very relevant since it occurred the night before the election. 144.178.0.146 (talk) 02:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC) DarwinReply
The section on Buck is ludicrously long and overly-detailed.
The page of George Gascon fails to mention any of the much worse controversies.
The section on Buck should be shortened significantly.
The idea that the Ed Buck case played virtually any role in George Gascon's come from behind victory in the 2020 general election is absurd. 2603:9001:4200:E2D1:7421:F2F9:AAB9:DD86 (talk) 21:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply