Talk:Jack McAuliffe (boxer)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jack McAuliffe (boxer) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
I doubt if Jack McAuliffe was born and became lightweight champion in the same year (1886)} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.39.168.250 (talk • contribs) 06:19, 29 March 2008
Requested move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 06:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Jack McAuliffe → Jack McAuliffe (boxer) – I don't suspect this person meets WP:PRIMARYTOPIC now that there's a third person by this name with an article. But I may be biased, as I just created the article that made it so. Checking Google, jack mcauliffe -wikipedia, the brewer actually seems more influential, but he was also in the news semi-recently, so that may be skewing results. On the other hand, the brewer's most notable activity occurred in the 70s and early 80s, so perhaps this isn't exactly WP:RECENTISM. Personally, I think the brewer has the best argument for primary topic, but especially without pageviews to guide us, making Jack McAuliffe a dab seems like the best way to go for now. BDD (talk) 19:41, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support - even in Google Books the brewer is catching up. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Support a disambiguation page is best -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 05:01, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.