Talk:Jack Livesey (impostor)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Legitimus in topic Not Notable
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Not Notable edit
This article appears to be yet another instance of a new account creating a page about a military imposter who is not notable for anything other than being a military imposter. In other words, the use of wikipedia as a pillory in much the way ARRSE mocks and shames individuals. This is not the purpose of wikipedia. In terms of policy, this violates WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, WP:NOTEBIO, WP:CRIME, and WP:LASTING. Unless compelling sources and changes can be made to bring this article into compliance with these polices, it will be deleted.Legitimus (talk) 13:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- He is notable for more than being a military impostor. He is also a published author, a historical advisor for movies and television shows, and has appeared on television as a military historian. That he achieved all of this on the basis of a falsified career makes it more noteworthy, and this is quite unusual. Also, my account is not new Sdc3000 (talk) 22:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- I would disagree that this article is mere pillory because Livesey is more notable than the average 'Walt.' He has written a number of books and they are still in publication; they're sold internationally by major distributors including Amazon and Barnes and Noble.2602:30A:2ED1:2EE0:C4ED:80DE:CCF5:9BDC (talk) 02:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
- Let the record show both these respondents (one being the creator of the article) are the same person and were indefinitely blocked from editing for engaging in sockpuppetry.Legitimus (talk) 14:22, 2 April 2017 (UTC)