Talk:JAD (software)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Franklin Yu in topic JAD or Jad?

Noteworthiness edit

What's it going to take to prove that the standard java decompiler is "noteworthy"? It's certainly more noteworthy than 98% of the stuff on wikipedia. Go check any major java site (IBM developer works, Sun, online sites, whatever) and you'll see it referenced time and time again. 76.68.27.113 (talk) 19:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

JAD a simple tool used in a limited number of circumstances, and never independently of some larger toolset. It's not worthy of its own entry. Also, Wikipedia requires reputable third party sources for information on a topic. I can't find such a source to explain what JAD is, where it comes from, what situations its used in, what is its relevance, etc. Not every program gets its own page on Wikipedia. Because of these things, I've nominated the article for deletion. Lousyd (talk) 17:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Down edit

Website is down. Is it dead? --206.72.77.76 (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pardon? edit

A vida me pregou mais uma peça por essa não pude esperar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.48.112.24 (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

JAD or Jad? edit

It is JAD or Jad? Currently this article uses both. --Mortense (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Author only called it "Jad" so I think it's reasonable to rename this article. --Franklin Yu (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Java not JAva edit

The title of the article is capitalized incorrectly. Is there any way to change that? Inside the article it is written as Java. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirbyqwerty12 (talkcontribs) 15:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's titled correctly. The 'A' is capitalized to emphasis that it is part of the acronym of 'JAD'. Rurik (talk) 20:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)Reply