Talk:JABS

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the JABS article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Autism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A few potential RS edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

User:Bangalamania, here are a few fairly readily consultable selections that I made based on this GoogleScholar search (I got as far as the bottom of the third page, and there are about 7 more pages you might like to consult).

Heller T (2001). "Ethical debate: Vaccination against mumps, measles, and rubella: is there a case for deepening the debate? How safe is MMR vaccine?". BMJ. 323 (7317): 838–9, discussion 840. PMC 1121387. PMID 11597968. (This article published in the BMJ in 2001 characterized JABS as "the main organisation" for discussions with concerned parents)

Hobson-West P (2007). "'Trusting blindly can be the biggest risk of all': organised resistance to childhood vaccination in the UK". Sociol Health Illn. 29 (2): 198–215. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00544.x. PMID 17381813.

Petersen, Alan; Wilkinson, Iain (2007). Health, Risk and Vulnerability. Routledge. pp. 148–150, 152. ISBN 978-1-134-17707-3.

Goldenberg, Maya J. (2016). "Public Misunderstanding of Science? Reframing the Problem of Vaccine Hesitancy". Perspectives on Science. 24 (5): 552–581. doi:10.1162/POSC_a_00223. ISSN 1063-6145. (Quote: The National Vaccine Information Center in the United States and the British group JABS (Justice Awareness and Basic Support) are strongly reproached for playing an instrumental role in misinforming the public, misdirecting health resources, engendering spurious controversy, and facilitating declining vaccination rates to levels below those needed for “herd immunity” in some regions by way of their emotional pleas (Fitzpatrick 2004c, 2004d; Offit 2011).)

Some info on the internet JABSforum contained in a paper (pdf) by Deborah Orpin in the proceedings of an academic conference held in 2017.

...

Hope this helps, 86.161.190.70 (talk) 16:43, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

@86.161.190.70: I've briefly looked through these sources and added some information, thank you so much for the help! --Bangalamania (talk) 18:46, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic