Talk:Italian battleship Conte di Cavour

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic Bargoni & Gay?
Good articleItalian battleship Conte di Cavour has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starItalian battleship Conte di Cavour is part of the Battleships of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 26, 2014Good article nomineeListed
September 11, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
November 25, 2019WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Current status: Good article

File:RNCavour-Napoli.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:RNCavour-Napoli.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Bargoni & Gay? edit

Bargoni and Gay is cited three times in the article, but is not listed in the references section. Is it:

  • Bargoni, Franco; Gay, Franco (1972). Corazzate classe Conte di Cavour. Rome: Bizzarri. OCLC 34904733. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help) from the Conte di Cavour-class battleship article - and if it is shouldn't the location be Rome rather than Roma?Nigel Ish (talk) 14:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply