Too much info. on "The Boy Is Mine" edit

In the 'Background' section, there is entirely too much background information on "The Boy Is Mine," and how that song came to be. Since this song a followup duet to that one, it makes sense that it be referenced here and there, but anything beyond a casual mention is too much and not applicable. I'll allow others to weigh in before I edit it out. The Real One Returns (talk) 22:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

It just states how the first duet came to be and how both singers felt about each other at that time. That information is important for the reader to "set himself into the story" and understand how they met and why they worked together again in 2012. - Saulo Talk to Me 23:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I rarely see people complaining about no info at all. Lol. Any way, I second what Sauloviegas said. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:04, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on It All Belongs to Me. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on It All Belongs to Me. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:22, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply