Talk:Issam Fares
Latest comment: 11 months ago by 31.94.27.116 in topic Contentious edits discussion.
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Contentious edits discussion. edit
Per the article history, I would like to invite the IP to explain their edits please. For context, some info was deleted on the ground of non-notable. It's been reverted by me three times, and now I'm trying to start a discussion to wonder what's going on. I'm just curious and would like a longer explanation to the deletion. Thanks. IP, I invite you here to explain your edits please. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 22:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- The edits are explained in the edit summary. Please do not add irrelevant information. Please do not claim edits are unexplained when they are. Please do not add inappropriate warnings to users pages. Please do not edit war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.94.27.116 (talk) 22:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- I wouldn't call it edit warring per se, but I would also like to comment on your accusation of me breaching 3RR, when I did not - I only made 3 reverts. If I had made a 4th, yes, then that would've been breaching 3RR. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 22:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- You were edit warring. You removed good edits. You added irrelevant information. You damaged the article. You posted inappropriate warning messages. Please stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.94.27.116 (talk) 22:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please refrain from accusing others of misbehavior, per WP:ASPERSIONS. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 23:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- You are accusing me of misbehaviour!?! Oh, the hypocrisy. It was you who initiated the difficulties by falsely claiming unexplained removal of content, adding inappropriate warnings on users pages, undertaking an edit war and then denying you were edit warring. I note you have long history of edit warring, and associated blocks: you clearly haven't learned.
- And for someone apparently so concerned about the style of interaction by users on Wikipedia you are advised to stop referring to others as 'dumbass', which edit summaries demonstrate you've done on multiple occasions ... so yet further examples of hypocrisy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.94.27.116 (talk) 23:16, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- You are accusing me of misbehaviour!?! Oh, the hypocrisy. It was you who initiated the difficulties by falsely claiming unexplained removal of content, adding inappropriate warnings on users pages, undertaking an edit war and then denying you were edit warring. I note you have long history of edit warring, and associated blocks: you clearly haven't learned.
- Please refrain from accusing others of misbehavior, per WP:ASPERSIONS. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 23:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- You were edit warring. You removed good edits. You added irrelevant information. You damaged the article. You posted inappropriate warning messages. Please stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.94.27.116 (talk) 22:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- I wouldn't call it edit warring per se, but I would also like to comment on your accusation of me breaching 3RR, when I did not - I only made 3 reverts. If I had made a 4th, yes, then that would've been breaching 3RR. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 22:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)