Talk:Isa al-Jowder

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Islamist or no? edit

Something's not adding up here on the "is he an Islamist or is he not" debate which has taken place via edit summaries. He is a member of the Haq Movement, so says the article. In the infobox on Haq Movement, it says "Political ideology: Islamism". People that adhere to Islamism are Islamists. So either the Haq Movement page is wrong and needs to be fixed or al-Jowder is an Islamist (or al-Jowder has performed an amazing feat by joining an Islamist organization while keeping himself removed from being categorised as an Islamist. I'm betting it's one of the first two.). Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

He is not Islamist. The Haq page is incorrect, but some editor keeps undoing the change without providing any source to back his/her claim. Haq is made up of both Islamists and secularists. --Arabbi (talk) 17:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I'll raise the issue on the Haq page. This seems to be the root of the misunderstanding on my part. Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Isa al-Jowder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply