This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Trusted Reviews review compared page loading times; Torch Mobile benchmarked the JavaScript engines. I don't see why we can't include both. JCDenton2052 (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Neither review as cited in this topic provided that information (also, to be useful, adding that information should take into account what the most common performance metric is - I'd suppose it's page loading though) Tedickey (talk) 11:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
