Talk:International rankings of India

X

Am I just seeing some crosses in my eyes or is it really the article? I mean almost all rankings are x!

Vandals or don't have any record? Marsa Lahminal (talk) 15:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

It's not due to vandalism. When I created the page, I put X where the rankings will go as a place holder. Any editor may look up India's ranking on a given list and then put in the data. Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 08:48, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International rankings of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090205010231/http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gitr/2008/Rankings.pdf to http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gitr/2008/Rankings.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Statistics removal discussion

I'm thinking about removing statistics that in no way make India notable and thus fail WP:LSC. Generally, statistics that reflect a notable part of a country such as agricultural statistics showing India's major agricultural industry would be notable; statistics about chess are not notable should be removed. What do you think? AnUnnamedUser (open talk page) 01:29, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Actually, there are many issues besides that can be worked on, including inconsistent capitalization and spacing and inconsistencies in the number of countries (going from 90 to 250!). I might fix them soon. AnUnnamedUser (open talk page) 01:38, 8 August 2019 (UTC)